SIPCO, LLC v. EMERSON ELECTRIC CO. , No. 21-1039 (Fed. Cir. 2022)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 21-1039 Document: 58 Page: 1 Filed: 05/03/2022 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SIPCO, LLC, Appellant v. EMERSON ELECTRIC CO., Appellee ______________________ 2021-1039, 2021-1040 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR201900545, IPR2019-00547. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JASON E. STACH, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by BENJAMIN AARON SAIDMAN; JAMES R. BARNEY, CONSTANTINE GREGORY GRAMENOPOULOS, Washington, DC. DOUGLAS HALLWARD-DRIEMEIER, Ropes & Gray LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by JAMES RICHARD BATCHELDER, JAMES LAWRENCE DAVIS, JR., DANIEL W. RICHARDS, East Palo Alto, CA. Case: 21-1039 Document: 58 Page: 2 Filed: 05/03/2022 ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, LOURIE and BRYSON, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT May 3, 2022 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.