In Re HUANG , No. 20-114 (Fed. Cir. 2020)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 20-114 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 02/28/2020 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ In re: XIAOHUA HUANG, Petitioner ______________________ 2020-114 ______________________ On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 2:16cv-00947-JRG-RSP, Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap. ______________________ ON PETITION ______________________ PER CURIAM. ORDER Xiaohua Huang petitions this court for a writ of mandamus directing the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas “to reverse the district court’s order which dismissed case 2:16-cv-947.” Mr. Huang’s petition references two cases, which he brought in the Eastern District of Texas, Huang v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., No. 2:15-cv-01413-JRG-RSP, and Huang v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., No. 2:16-cv00947-JRG-RSP. Mr. Huang previously unsuccessfully appealed the final judgments in both of those cases. See Huang v. Huawei Techs. Co., Nos. 2017-1505 et al., slip op. Case: 20-114 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 02/28/2020 IN RE: HUANG 2 at 13 (Fed. Cir. June 8, 2018); Huang v. Huawei Techs. Co., No. 2019-1726, slip op. at 6 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2019). Mandates in both have since issued. Mr. Huang’s petition is nothing more than an attempt to relitigate the final judgments that he previously unsuccessfully appealed. Because Mr. Huang clearly does not have a right to the relief he seeks, the court must deny his petition. See Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Dist. of Columbia, 542 U.S. 367, 380–81 (2004). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. (2) All pending motions are denied as moot. FOR THE COURT February 28, 2020 Date s24 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.