CASTILLO v. US , No. 19-1158 (Fed. Cir. 2020)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on February 20, 2020.
Download PDF
Case: 19-1158 Document: 82 Page: 1 Filed: 03/06/2020 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ REINALDO CASTILLO, GONZALO PADRON MARINO, MAYDA ROTELLA, JULIA GARCIA, SHOPS ON FLAGER INC., JOSE F. DUMENIGO, DORA A. DUMENIGO, HUMBERTO J. DIAZ, JOSEFA MARCIA DIAZ, LUIS CRESPO, JOSE LUIS NAPOLE, GRACE BARSELLO NAPOLE, BERNARDO D. MANDULEY, NORMA A. MANDULEY, DANILO A. RODRIGUEZ, DORA RODRIGUEZ, AVIMAEL AREVALO, ODALYS AREVALO, DALIA ESPINOSA, DANIEL ESPINOSA, SOFIRA GONZALEZ, LOURDEZ RODRIGUEZ, ALBERTO PEREZ, MAYRA LOPEZ, NIRALDO HERNANDEZ PADRON, MERCEDES ALINA FALERO, LUISA PALENCIA, XIOMARA RODRIGUEZ, HUGO E. DIAZ, AND, CONCEPCION V. DIAZ, AS CO-TRUSTEES OF THE DIAZ FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST, SOUTH AMERICAN TILE, LLC, GLADYS HERNANDEZ, NELSON MENENDEZ, JOSE MARTIN MARTINEZ, NORMA DEL SOCORRO GOMEZ, OSVALDO BORRAS, JR., LUIS R. SCHMIDT, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2019-1158 Case: 19-1158 Document: 82 2 Page: 2 Filed: 03/06/2020 CASTILLO v. UNITED STATES ______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in Nos. 1:16-cv-01624-MBH, 1:17-cv-01931-MBH, Senior Judge Marian Blank Horn. ______________________ ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING ______________________ Before WALLACH, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. ORDER This court issued a precedential opinion in this case on February 20, 2020. Castillo v. United States, __ F.3d __, 2020 WL 827856 (Fed. Cir. 2020). On March 4, 2020, the government filed a petition for panel rehearing. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The petition for panel rehearing is granted for the limited purpose of substituting the attached revised opinion for the previously issued opinion. 2. The previous precedential opinion and judgment, dated February 20, 2020, are hereby withdrawn and replaced with the modified precedential opinion and judgment attached to this order. The only changes from the previously issued opinion are a revision of the sentence now on page 4, lines 22–29, and deletion of a phrase on page 7, line 22. FOR THE COURT March 6, 2020 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
