FLAMM v. MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. , No. 18-2384 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ DANIEL L. FLAMM, Appellant v. MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC., INTEL CORPORATION, GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., INC., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD., Appellees ______________________ 2018-2384, 2018-2385 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR201700392, IPR2017-00406, IPR2017-01747, IPR2017-01748. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ ROLF STADHEIM, Stadheim & Grear, Scottsdale, AZ, argued for appellant. JARED BOBROW, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Menlo Park, CA, argued for appellees Micron Technology, Inc., Intel Corporation and GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., Inc. Appellee Micron Technology, Inc. also represented by JEREMY JASON LANG; MELANIE L. BOSTWICK, Washington, DC. CHAD S. CAMPBELL, Perkins Coie LLP, Phoenix, AZ, for appellee Intel Corporation. Also represented by TYLER R. BOWEN; DAN L. BAGATELL, Hanover, NH; PHILIP ALCIDE MORIN, San Diego, CA; JONATHAN L. MCFARLAND, Seattle, WA. SHAMITA ETIENNE-CUMMINGS, White & Case LLP, Washington, DC, for appellee GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., Inc. Also represented by DAVID TENNANT. NAVEEN MODI, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, for appellee Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, PLAGER and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 6, 2019 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.