VAN DER HOEVEN HORTICULTURAL v. GLASS INVESTMENT PROJECTS , No. 18-2234 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ VAN DER HOEVEN HORTICULTURAL PROJECTS B.V., Appellant v. GLASS INVESTMENT PROJECTS, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2018-2234 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR201700476. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JUSTIN J. OLIVER, Venable LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by ANDREW KUTAS, MICHAEL P. SANDONATO, New York, NY. MICHAEL J. WISE, Perkins Coie, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by LARA DUEPPEN; ANDREW DUFRESNE, Madison, WI. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 11, 2019 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.