POLARIS INNOVATIONS LIMITED v. US , No. 18-1831 (Fed. Cir. 2022)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on January 31, 2020.
Download PDF
Case: 18-1831 Document: 169 Page: 1 Filed: 12/07/2022 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ POLARIS INNOVATIONS LIMITED, Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Intervenor ______________________ 2018-1831 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR201700116. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ AZRA HADZIMEHMEDOVIC, Tensegrity Law Group LLP, McLean, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by SAMANTHA A. JAMESON, AARON MATTHEW NATHAN; MATTHEW D. POWERS, DANIEL RADKE, Redwood Shores, CA; NATHAN NOBU LOWENSTEIN, KENNETH J. WEATHERWAX, Lowenstein & Weatherwax LLP, Los Angeles, CA. PETER J. AYERS, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for Case: 18-1831 Document: 169 Page: 2 Filed: 12/07/2022 intervenor. Also represented by DANIEL KAZHDAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED; COURTNEY DIXON, JOSEPH H. HUNT, SCOTT R. MCINTOSH, MELISSA N. PATTERSON, Civil Division, Appellate Staff, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (DYK, REYNA, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 7, 2022 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
