PITTMAN v. US [RULE 36 JUDGMENT - NONPRECEDENTIAL] , No. 18-1481 (Fed. Cir. 2019)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CHRIS L. PITTMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2018-1481 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:15-cv-01232-SGB, Senior Judge Susan G. Braden. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JOHN B. WELLS, Law Office of John B. Wells, Slidell, LA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. DANIEL S. HERZFELD, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by ROBERT EDWARD KIRSCHMAN, JR., DOUGLAS K. MICKLE, JOSEPH H. HUNT. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (WALLACH, TARANTO, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 8, 2019 Date /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow Jarrett B. Perlow Chief Deputy Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.