SIPCO, LLC v. EMERSON ELECTRIC CO. , No. 18-1364 (Fed. Cir. 2021)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Case: 18-1364 Document: 78 Page: 1 Filed: 01/21/2021 NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SIPCO, LLC, Appellant v. EMERSON ELECTRIC CO., Appellee ______________________ 2018-1364 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR201600984. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ GREGORY J. GONSALVES, Falls Church, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by THOMAS F. MEAGHER, Meagher Emanuel Laks Goldberg & Bovino, LLP, Princeton, NJ. JAMES LAWRENCE DAVIS, JR., Ropes & Gray LLP, East Palo Alto, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by JAMES RICHARD BATCHELDER; STEVEN PEPE, New York, NY; DOUGLAS HALLWARD-DRIEMEIER, KATHRYN C. THORNTON, Washington, DC. Case: 18-1364 Document: 78 Page: 2 Filed: 01/21/2021 BENJAMIN T. HICKMAN, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for amicus curiae United States. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MONICA BARNES LATEEF, ROBERT J. MCMANUS, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED; MELISSA N. PATTERSON, JACK STARCHER, Appellate Staff, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MAYER and MOORE, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 21, 2021 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.