US CAPITOL POLICE v. OOC , No. 17-2060 (Fed. Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE, Petitioner v. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE, Respondent UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE LABOR COMMITTEE, Intervenor ______________________ 2017-2060, 2017-2062, 2017-2063, 2017-2064 ______________________ Petitions for review of decisions of the Board of Directors of the Office of Compliance in Nos. 16-LM-03 (NG), 16-LM-04 (NG), 16-LM-05 (NG), 16-LM-06 (NG). ______________________ Decided: November 6, 2018 ______________________ FREDERICK M. HERRERA, Office of Employment Counsel, United States Capitol Police, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner. Also represented by RAFIQUE OMAR ANDERSON, KELLY MARISSA SCINDIAN. JOHN D. UELMEN, Office of the General Counsel, US CAPITOL POLICE v. OOC 2 United States Office of Compliance, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by JULIA AKINS CLARK. MEGAN KATHLEEN MECHAK, Woodley & McGillivary LLP, Washington, DC, argued for intervenor. ______________________ Before DYK, LINN, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The petitions for review are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction in this court. See U.S. Capitol Police v. Office of Compliance, Nos. 2017-2061, 2018-1504, slip op. at 8–12 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 6, 2018). No costs. DISMISSED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.