AUTOMATED MERCHANDISING SYSTEM v. IANCU , No. 17-1953 (Fed. Cir. 2018)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AUTOMATED MERCHANDISING SYSTEMS, INC., Appellant v. ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Intervenor ______________________ 2017-1953, 2017-1954, 2017-1955, 2017-1957 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 95/000,604, 95/000,605, 95/000,606, 95/000,607. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JAMES DANIEL BERQUIST, Davidson Berquist Jackson & Gowdey, LLP, Arlington, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by PETER WHITLOCK GOWDEY, DONALD LEE JACKSON, McLean, VA. PHILIP J. WARRICK, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, WILLIAM LAMARCA, JOSEPH MATAL, ROBERT J. MCMANUS. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, WALLACH and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 9, 2018 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.