IN RE: DOCTER OPTICS, SE , No. 17-1126 (Fed. Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: DOCTER OPTICS, SE, Appellant ______________________ 2017-1126 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/888,706. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DEBORAH POLLACK-MILGATE, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Indianapolis, IN, argued for appellant. Also represented by LEAH LEWIS SIEGEL; RICHARD B. LAZARUS, Washington, DC. NATHAN K. KELLEY, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, MARY L. KELLY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 17, 2017 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.