IN RE: ROCKENBERGER , No. 17-1035 (Fed. Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: JOERG ROCKENBERGER, MAO TAKASHIMA, FABIO ZURCHER, KEVIN HUBERT, KLAUS KUNZE, WENZHUO GUO, BRENT RIDLEY, Appellants ______________________ 2017-1035 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 10/789,274. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ ANDREW DAVID FORTNEY, Central California IP Group, PC, Fresno, CA, argued for appellants. BRIAN RACILLA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Joseph Matal. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, ROBERT MCBRIDE. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (TARANTO, CLEVENGER, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 14, 2017 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.