AAT BIOQUEST, INC. v. TEXAS FLUORESCENCE , No. 16-2056 (Fed. Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ AAT BIOQUEST, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. TEXAS FLUORESCENCE LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2016-2056 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 4:14-cv-03909-DMR, Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu. ______________________ Decided: February 15, 2017 ______________________ KRISTA MARIE CARTER, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP, Palo Alto, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by DEBORAH E. FISHMAN. RICK B. YEAGER, Austin, TX, argued for defendantappellant. ______________________ Before PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and CHEN, Circuit Judges. 2 AAT BIOQUEST, INC. v. TEXAS FLUORESCENCE PER CURIAM. On this limited record and in light of the arguments raised, the district court judgment is affirmed. AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.