WILLIAMSON v. CITRIX ONLINE, LLC , No. 16-1714 (Fed. Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ RICHARD A. WILLIAMSON, ON BEHALF OF AND AS TRUSTEE FOR AT HOME BONDHOLDERS' LIQUIDATING TRUST, Plaintiff-Appellant v. CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., MICROSOFT CORPORATION, WEBEX COMMUNICATIONS, INC., CISCO WEBEX, LLC, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., GETGO, INC., Defendants-Appellees ADOBE SYSTEMS, INC., INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, Defendants ______________________ 2016-1714 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 2:11-cv-02409-SJOJEM, Judge James S. Otero. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ BRETT JOHNSTON WILLIAMSON, O’Melveny & Myers LLP, Newport Beach, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by TIM D. BYRON, San Francisco, CA; BRIAN T. BAGLEY, SCOTT DION MARRS, WILLIAM C. NORVELL, JR., Akerman LLP, Houston, TX. JONATHAN J. LAMBERSON, Fish & Richardson, PC, Redwood City, CA, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendants-appellees Citrix Systems, Inc., Microsoft Corporation, GetGo, Inc. also represented by FRANK SCHERKENBACH, KURT LOUIS GLITZENSTEIN, Boston, MA; CRAIG E. COUNTRYMAN, San Diego, CA; INDRANIL MUKERJI, Washington, DC. Defendant-appellee Microsoft Corporation also represented by ISABELLA FU, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA. HAROLD BARZA, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for defendant-appellees Webex Communications, Inc., Cisco Webex, LLC, Cisco Systems, Inc. Also represented by TIGRAN GULEDJIAN, JORDAN BROCK KAERICHER, VALERIE RODDY. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: es). PER CURIAM (MOORE, LINN, and STOLL, Circuit JudgAFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 7, 2017 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.