ENOVSYS LLC v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC , No. 16-1691 (Fed. Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ ENOVSYS LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. AT&T MOBILITY LLC, AT&T MOBILITY II LLC, Defendants-Cross-Appellants ______________________ 2016-1691, 2016-1767 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 2:11-cv-05210-SS, Magistrate Judge Suzanne H. Segal. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ BRUCE G. CHAPMAN, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiffappellant. MICHAEL HAWES, Baker Botts, LLP, Houston, TX, argued for defendants-cross-appellants. Also represented by BRYANT C. BOREN, JR., ELIOT DAMON WILLIAMS, Palo Alto, CA; TIMOTHY S. DURST, BRIAN DOUGLAS JOHNSTON, Dallas, TX. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (DYK, O’MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 10, 2017 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.