CAO GROUP, INC. v. BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, INC. , No. 16-1664 (Fed. Cir. 2017)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CAO GROUP, INC., Appellant v. BIOLASE TECHNOLOGY, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2016-1664 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,271. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ H. DICKSON BURTON, TraskBritt, PC, Salt Lake City, UT, argued for appellant. Also represented by J. JEFFREY GUNN, STEPHEN E. PULLEY. JOSHUA LEE RASKIN, Greenberg Traurig LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, MOORE, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 27, 2017 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.