SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC v. ACTAVIS INC. , No. 16-1619 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. ACTAVIS INC., WATSON LABORATORIES, INC. FLORIDA, NKA ACTAVIS LABORATORIES FL, INC., ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., WATSON LABORATORIES, INC., ANDA, INC., Defendants-Appellants ______________________ 2016-1619 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in No. 1:13-cv-04740-RMB-JS, Judge Renee Marie Bumb. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ NICHOLAS F. GIOVE, Frommer Lawrence & Haug LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by EDGAR HAUG, KEVIN GEORGEK, JONATHAN HERSTOFF, ANDREW SCOTT ROPER; DAMON MARCUS LEWIS, Washington, DC; WILLIAM CHARLES BATON, CHARLES M. LIZZA, Saul Ewing, LLP, Newark NJ. CHARLES A. WEISS, Holland & Knight, LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendants-appellants. Also represented by NICHOLAS P. CHIARA, LESLIE JILL KUSHNER, HOWARD S. SUH, ERIC H. YECIES. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (DYK, CLEVENGER, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 12, 2016 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.