IN RE: HEDLOY , No. 16-1093 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: ATLE HEDLOY, Appellant ______________________ 2016-1093 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 13/449,086. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ BRUCE D. SUNSTEIN, Sunstein Kann Murphy & Timbers LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellant. MONICA BARNES LATEEF, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, MEREDITH HOPE SCHOENFELD, SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, BRYSON and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 15, 2016 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.