JOHNSON v. NAVY , No. 15-3174 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LEE JOHNSON, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, Respondent ______________________ 2015-3174 ______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF-1221-14-0828-W-1. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ PETER BROIDA, Arlington, VA, argued for petitioner. SONIA MARIE ORFIELD, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., ELIZABETH M. HOSFORD; TRACEY R. ROCKENBACH, Office of the General Counsel, United States Department of the Navy, Washington, DC. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 17, 2016 Date /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.