IN RE: NOBLITT , No. 15-1876 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: DANIEL J. NOBLITT, Appellant ______________________ 2015-1876 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 11/738,257. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DANIEL J. NOBLITT, The Noblitt Group, PLLC, Scottsdale, AZ, argued pro se. ROBERT MCBRIDE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, AMY J. NELSON. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, SCHALL, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 21, 2016 Date /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.