PENTAIR WATER POOL AND SPA v. HAYWARD INDUSTRIES, INC. , No. 15-1809 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PENTAIR WATER POOL AND SPA, INC., Appellant v. HAYWARD INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2015-1809 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 95/002,007. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ MARK BOLAND, Sughrue Mion, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by RAJA N. SALIBA, GRANT SIMON SHACKELFORD. MARK NIKOLSKY, McCarter & English, LLP, Newark, NJ, argued for appellee. Also represented by SCOTT S. CHRISTIE, STEVEN HALPERN, TIMOTHY PATRICK HOMLISH, MATTHEW ADAM SKLAR, ELINA SLAVIN. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 14, 2016 Date /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.