PHISON ELECTRONICS CORP. v. SILICON MOTION TECHNOLOGY , No. 15-1632 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PHISON ELECTRONICS CORP., Appellant v. SILICON MOTION TECHNOLOGY CORP., Appellee ______________________ 2015-1632 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR201300473. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DAVID MICHAEL HOFFMAN, Fish & Richardson, P.C., Austin, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by DAVID M. BARKAN, Redwood City, CA; PROSHANTO MUKHERJI, Boston, MA. JASON ALEXANDER ENGEL, K&L Gates LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by BENJAMIN EDWARD WEED, DEVON C. BEANE; MELVIN CHAN, AKA Chan LLP, Santa Clara, CA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 11, 2016 Date /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.