OSRAM GMBH v. SCHUBERT , No. 15-1620 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ OSRAM GMBH, Appellant v. E. FRED SCHUBERT, Appellee ______________________ 2015-1620 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in No. IPR201300459. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ CHARLES SANDERS, Latham & Watkins LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellant. Also represented by WILLIAM M. JAY, Goodwin Procter LLP, Washington, DC. DANIEL LADOW, Troutman Sanders LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellee. Also represented by JAMES M. BOLLINGER, MAGNUS ESSUNGER, TIMOTHY P. HEATON; JUSTIN BARNES, LARA SUE GARNER, San Diego, CA. THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by SCOTT WEIDENFELLER, LORE A. UNT. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (DYK, MAYER, and STOLL, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT April 8, 2016 Date /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.