BRIDGEPORT FITTINGS, INC. v. ARLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC. , No. 15-1616 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ BRIDGEPORT FITTINGS, INC., Appellant v. ARLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2015-1616, 2015-1617 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 95/001,830, 95/001,829. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ MARK E. UNGERMAN, Ungerman IP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by ALAN MARSHALL ANDERSON, MATTHEW ROBERT PALEN, Alan Anderson Law Firm LLC, Minneapolis, MN. KATHRYN CLUNE, Crowell & Moring, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by JACOB ZIEMOWIT ZAMBRZYCKI, San Francisco, CA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 17, 2016 Date /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.