PRICEPLAY.COM, INC. v. AOL ADVERTISING, INC. , No. 15-1492 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PRICEPLAY.COM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant v. AOL ADVERTISING, INC., FACEBOOK INC., GOOGLE INC., Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2015-1492, 2015-1589, 2015-1660 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:14-cv-00092-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews, United States District Court for the Northern District of California in Nos. 3:14-cv-04830-SI, 3:14-cv-04828-SI, Judge Susan Y. Illston. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ SCOTT DANIELS, Westerman, Hattori, Daniels & Adrian, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by DARRIN A. AUITO. DARYL JOSEFFER, King & Spalding LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellees. Appellee Google Inc., also represented by PAUL ALESSIO MEZZINA; ADAM CONRAD, Charlotte, NC. Appellee AOL Advertising, Inc., also represented by GEORGE FRANK PAPPAS, PETER ANDREW SWANSON, Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, DC. Appellee Facebook Inc., also represented by HEIDI LYN KEEFE, MARK R. WEINSTEIN, LAM K. NGUYEN, Cooley LLP, Palo Alto, CA; MICHAEL GRAHAM RHODES, San Francisco, CA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, BRYSON, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT January 7, 2016 Date /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.