INTERFACE, INC. v. TANDUS CENTIVA INC. , No. 15-1475 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INTERFACE, INC., Appellant v. TANDUS CENTIVA INC., Appellee ______________________ 2015-1475, 2015-1668 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2013-00333, IPR2013-00527. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ CANDICE C. DECAIRE, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by ADAM HOWARD CHARNES, Winston-Salem, NC. BARRY J. HERMAN, Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice LLP, Baltimore, MD, argued for appellee. Also represented by PRESTON HAMILTON HEARD, DANA E. STANO, Atlanta, GA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (REYNA, BRYSON, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 8, 2016 Date /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.