RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. CAMTEK, LTD. , No. 15-1434 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ RUDOLPH TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. CAMTEK, LTD., Defendant-Appellant ______________________ 2015-1434 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota in No. 0:05-cv-01396-JRT-FLN, Judge John R. Tunheim. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DANIEL W. MCDONALD, Merchant & Gould P.C., Minneapolis, MN, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by RACHEL C. HUGHEY, MICHAEL A. ERBELE. DANIEL HOWARD BROMBERG, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Redwood Shores, CA, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by CLAUDE M. STERN; DAVID LEON BILSKER, San Francisco, CA. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (MOORE, O’MALLEY, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT February 3, 2016 Date /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.