Synopsys, Inc. v. Lee, No. 15-1183 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseSynopsys filed suit under the Administrative Procedure Act, seeking to invalidate the Patent and Trademark Office’s regulation that allows the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to institute inter partes review on “all or some of the challenged claims,” 37 C.F.R. 42.108. The suit also challenged the PTO’s practice of issuing final decisions on fewer than all of the claims raised in a petition. The district court dismissed, finding that “Congress intended to preclude this Court from reviewing inter partes proceedings under the APA” and, alternatively, that the appeal from a final written decision of an inter partes review provides an adequate remedy, barring judicial review. Synopsys also appealed from a final order of the Board concerning inter partes review of the 376 patent, as failing to address every claim challenged in the petition for inter partes review. The Federal Circuit upheld the validity of the regulation and the practice and dismissed the appeal as moot.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.