REDLINE DETECTION, LLC v. STAR ENVIROTECH, INC. , No. 15-1047 (Fed. Cir. 2016)
Annotate this CaseThis opinion or order relates to an opinion or order originally issued on December 31, 2015.
Download PDF
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ January 20, 2016 ERRATA ______________________ Appeal No. 2015-1047 REDLINE DETECTION, LLC, Appellant v. STAR ENVIROTECH, INC., Appellee Decided: December 31, 2015 Precedential Opinion ______________________ Please make the following changes: On page twenty-four, lines 1–9, replace the sentence When asserting that a claimed invention would have been obvious, that party “must demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that a skilled artisan would have had reason to combine the teaching of the prior art references to achieve the claimed invention, and that the skilled artisan would have had a reasonable expectation of success from doing so.” PAR Pharm., Inc. v. TWI Pharm., Inc., 773 F.3d 2 REDLINE DETECTION, LLC v. STAR ENVIROTECH, INC. 1186, 1193 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). with the following sentence: When asserting that a claimed invention would have been obvious, that party “must demonstrate . . . that a skilled artisan would have had reason to combine the teaching of the prior art references to achieve the claimed invention, and that the skilled artisan would have had a reasonable expectation of success from doing so.” PAR Pharm., Inc. v. TWI Pharm., Inc., 773 F.3d 1186, 1193 (Fed. Cir. 2014) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see Ariosa Diagnostics v. Verinata Health, Inc., 805 F.3d 1359, 1364–65 (Fed. Cir. 2015); see also 35 U.S.C. § 316(e) (“In an inter partes review instituted under this chapter, the petitioner shall have the burden of proving a proposition of unpatentability by a preponderance of the evidence.”).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
