PROFECTUS TECHNOLOGY LLC v. HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD. , No. 15-1016 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ PROFECTUS TECHNOLOGY LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant v. HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO., LTD., HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC., HUAWEI DEVICE USA, INC., FUTUREWEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Defendants DELL INC., APPLE INC., SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC, HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY, HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P., Defendants-Appellees ______________________ 2015-1016, 2015-1018, 2015-1019 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 6:11-cv-00474-MHS, 6:11-cv-00674-MHS, 6:11-cv-00676-MHS, Judge Michael H. Schneider. ______________________ ORDER ______________________ 2 PROFECTUS TECH. LLC v. HUAWEI TECHS. CO., LTD. Before MOORE, REYNA, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. On October 27, 2015, we ordered the parties to prepare to show cause at oral argument as to why sanctions should not be imposed for violation of Federal Circuit Rule 28(d). The parties addressed the issue of sanctions at oral argument and refiled corrected briefing and appendices following oral argument. Regarding the showcause order on October 27, 2015, we decline to impose sanctions for violation of Federal Circuit Rule 28(d). IT IS ORDERED THAT: Sanctions are not imposed. FOR THE COURT May 26, 2016 Date /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.