DAWSON v. US , No. 14-5115 (Fed. Cir. 2016)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LEE DAWSON, ON HIS OWN BEHALF AND ALL OTHERS SIMILARY SITUATED, Plaintiff-Appellant v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________ 2014-5115 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:13-cv-00297-EGB, Senior Judge Eric G. Bruggink. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DANIEL BERKO, Law Office of Daniel Berko, San Francisco, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. TANYA KOENIG, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ROBERT E. KIRSCHMAN, JR., REGINALD T. BLADES, JR. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, O’MALLEY, and CHEN, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT March 21, 2016 Date /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.