CONVATEC TECHNOLOGIES INC. v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. , No. 14-1822 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CONVATEC TECHNOLOGIES INC., Appellant v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., Appellee ______________________ 2014-1822, 2014-1823 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2013-00097, IPR2013-00102. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ RICHARD TORCZON, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, PC, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by JEFFREY WILLIAM GUISE, PETER R. MUNSON, LORELEI PEREZ WESTIN, San Diego, CA. BRADLEY THOMAS LENNIE, Hunton & Williams LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by JEFFREY B. VOCKRODT, CHRISTOPHER H. YAEN; DAVID A. KELLY, Atlanta, GA. MONICA BARNES LATEEF, Office of the Solictor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, SCOTT WEIDENFELLER. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: es). PER CURIAM (CHEN, LINN, and HUGHES, Circuit JudgAFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 10, 2015 Date /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.