INRE: KRISHNAN , No. 14-1649 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 14-1649 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 09/19/2014 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE SCREENIVAS KRISHNAN, KOEN BENNEBROEK, KARTHIK BHAT, STEFANO A. PESCADOR, DAVID G. REED, BRAD W. SIMERAL, AND EDWARD M. VEESER ______________________ 2014-1649 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 11/610,411. ______________________ ON MOTION ______________________ Before O MALLEY, WALLACH, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges. O MALLEY, Circuit Judge. ORDER The Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office ( PTO ) moves without opposition to remand this case to the PTO for further proceedings. The Patent Trial and Appeal Board affirmed the Examiner s rejection of certain claims, but the PTO concedes that the Board should reconsider its rejection in light of the PTO s examination policy on configured to claim language. Case: 14-1649 Document: 13 2 Page: 2 Filed: 09/19/2014 IN RE KRISHNAN Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. This case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs. FOR THE COURT /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk of Court s30 ISSUED AS A MANDATE: September 19, 2014
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
