INVISTA NORTH AMERICA v. M&G POLYMERS USA , No. 14-1432 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ INVISTA NORTH AMERICA S.A.R.L., Plaintiff-Appellee, AND AURIGA POLYMERS INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. M&G POLYMERS USA LLC AND M&G USA CORPORATION, Defendants-Appellants. ______________________ 2014-1432 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:11-cv-01007-SLR-CJB, Judge Sue L. Robinson. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ MEGAN D. DORTENZO, Thompson Hine LLP, of Cleveland, Ohio, argued for defendants-appellants. With her on the brief was ARTHUR P. LICYGIEWICZ. Of counsel on the brief were WILLIAM P. ATKINS and CHRISTOPHER K. DORSEY, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, of McLean, Virginia. WILLIAM J. MARSDEN, JR., Fish & Richardson P.C., of Wilmington, Delaware, argued for plaintiffs-appellees. With him on the brief for INVISTA North America S.a.r.l. were DOUGLAS E. MCCANN, MARTINA TYREUS HUFNAL, ROBERT M. OAKES, and MICHELLE NEROZZI-ANKENBRAND. On the brief for Auriga Polymers Inc. were JOHN W. SHAW and JEFFREY T. CASTELLANO, Shaw Keller LLP, of Wilmington, Delaware. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 13, 2014 Date /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk of Court
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
