CLEAR WITH COMPUTERS, LLC v. DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC. , No. 14-1336 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 14-1336 Document: 48 Page: 1 Filed: 09/11/2014 NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CLEAR WITH COMPUTERS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC., FORTY NINERS FOOTBALL COMPANY, LLC, HELLY HANSON (U.S.) INC., LEVI STRAUSS & CO., NFL ENTERPRISES LLC, SPANX, INC., AND MLB ADVANCED MEDIA, L.P., Defendants-Appellees, AND THE FINISH LINE, INC., Defendant-Appellee, AND TORY BURCH LLC, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________ 2014-1336, -1338, -1340, -1341, -1342, -1343, -1344, -1345, -1346 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in Nos. 6:12-cv-00674-LED, 6:12-cv-00675-LED, 6:12-cv-00868-LED, 6:12-cv-00945- Case: 14-1336 Document: 48 Page: 2 Filed: 09/11/2014 2 CLEAR WITH COMPUTERS, LLC v. DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC. LED, 6:12-cv-00947-LED, 6:12-cv-00948-LED, 6:12-cv00949-LED, 6:12-cv-00950-LED, 6:12-cv-00951-LED, Chief Judge Leonard Davis. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------CLEAR WITH COMPUTERS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HUGO BOSS FASHIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. ______________________ 2014-1339 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 6:12-cv-00867-LED, Chief Judge Leonard Davis. ______________________ ORDER Upon consideration of the parties joint motion to dismiss 2014-1339, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. 2014-1339 is dismissed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs in 2014-1339. (3) The revised official caption for 2014-1336, et al. is reflected above. Case: 14-1336 Document: 48 CLEAR WITH COMPUTERS, LLC Page: 3 Filed: 09/11/2014 v. DICK'S SPORTING GOODS, INC.3 FOR THE COURT /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk of Court s26 ISSUED AS A MANDATE (for 2014-1339 only): September 11, 2014

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.