IN RE: PACTIV LLC , No. 14-1066 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE PACTIV LLC ______________________ 2014-1066, -1067, -1068, -1069, -1070 ______________________ Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 90/011,132, 90/010,976, 90/011,128, 90/011,130, and 90/011,131. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ DANIEL H. SHULMAN, Reynolds Group Holdings, Ltd., of Lake Forest, Illinois, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was JOHN C. GATZ, Nixon Peabody LLP, of Chicago, Illinois. AMY J. NELSON, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Arlington, Virginia, argued for appellee. With her on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, SCOTT C. WEIDENFELLER, Senior Counsel for Patent Law and Litigation, and ROBERT J. MCMANUS, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 15, 2014 Date /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.