JARROW FORMULAS, INC. v. NOW HEALTH GROUP, INC. , No. 14-1020 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ JARROW FORMULAS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NOW HEALTH GROUP, INC., doing business as Now Foods, Defendant-Cross Appellant. ----------------------SOFT GEL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant-Cross Appellant, v. JARROW FORMULAS, INC., Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellant. ______________________ 2014-1020, -1033, -1039 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in Nos. 2:10-cv-08301-PSGJC and 2:11-cv-00164-PSG-JC, Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ MARK D. GIARRATANA and THOMAS J. RECHEN, McCarter & English, LLP, of Hartford, Connecticut, argued for Jarrow Formulas, Inc. With them on the brief were ERIC E. GRONDAHL and CHARLES D. RAY. SRI K. SANKARAN, Winthrop & Weinstine, P.A., of Minneapolis, Minnesota, argued for cross appellants, Soft Gel Technologies, Inc. With him on the brief for Soft Gel was DEVAN V. PADMANABHAN. On the brief for Now Health Group, Inc., were R. DAVID DONOGHUE and STEVEN E. JEDLINSKI, Holland & Knight LLP, of Chicago, Illinois. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (WALLACH, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. 1 See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 8, 2014 Date /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk of Court Accordingly, the Motion to Strike filed by Jarrow Formulas, Inc. (ECF No. 57) is DENIED as moot. 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.