IN RE: LANG , No. 13-1639 (Fed. Cir. 2014)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE KEVIN W. LANG AND JAMES W. DIBBLE ______________________ 2013-1639 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in Serial No. 12/856,501. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ JONATHAN D. BALL, Greenberg Traurig, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for appellants. Of counsel was RICHARD C. PETTUS. JOSEPH G. PICCOLO, Associate Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Solicitor, and MICHAEL S. FORMAN, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN and HUGHES, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 13, 2014 Date /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.