IMAGINAL SYSTEMATIC, LLC v. LEGGETT & PLATT, INC. , No. 13-1547 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Case: 13-1547 Document: 17 Page: 1 Filed: 10/10/2013 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IMAGINAL SYSTEMATIC, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LEGGETT & PLATT, INC. AND SIMMONS BEDDING COMPANY, Defendants-Appellees, AND DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE, Defendants. ______________________ 2013-1547 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 10-CV-7416, Judge R. Gary Klausner. --------------------------------------------------IMAGINAL SYSTEMATIC, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LEGGETT & PLATT, INC. AND SIMMONS BEDDING COMPANY, Defendants-Appellants, Case: 13-1547 2 Document: 17 Page: 2 IMAGINAL SYSTEMATIC, LLC Filed: 10/10/2013 v. LEGGETT & PLATT, INC. AND DOES 1-10, INCLUSIVE, Defendants. ______________________ 2013-1548 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 10-CV-7416, Judge R. Gary Klausner. __________________________ ON MOTION __________________________ ORDER Imaginal Systematic, LLC moves without opposition to withdraw its appeal no. 2013-1547. The parties jointly request that the official caption be amended and the brief due date for Leggett & Platt, Inc., et al. be set for December 16, 2013. Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion to withdraw 2013-1547 is granted. 2013-1547 is dismissed. (2) Each side shall bear its own costs in 2013-1547. (3) The revised official caption for 2013-1548 is reflected above. (4) Leggett & Platt, Inc., et al. s opening brief is due on or before December 16, 2013. Case: 13-1547 Document: 17 IMAGINAL SYSTEMATIC, LLC Page: 3 Filed: 10/10/2013 v. LEGGETT & PLATT, INC. 3 FOR THE COURT /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk s21 ISSUED AS A MANDATE (as to 2013-1547 only): October 10, 2013

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.