GRIFFIN TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. ITC , No. 13-1230 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ GRIFFIN TECHNOLOGY, INC., Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, AND OTTER PRODUCTS, LLC (doing business as Otterbox), Intervenor. ______________________ 2013-1230 ______________________ Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-780. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ TERRY L. CLARK, Bass, Berry & Sims, PLC, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. PANYIN A. HUGHES, Attorney, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were PAUL R. BARDOS, Acting General Counsel, and SIDNEY A. ROSENWEIG, Acting Assistant General Counsel. Of counsel was WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, Attorney. LOUIS S. MASTRIANI, Adduci, Mastriani & Schaumberg, L.L.P., of Washington, DC, argued for intervenor. With him on the brief were DANIEL F. SMITH and EVAN H. LANGDON. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (O MALLEY, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 12, 2013 Date /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.