MONDIS TECHNOLOGY LTD. v. INNOLUX CORPORATION , No. 13-1178 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ MONDIS TECHNOLOGY LTD., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. INNOLUX CORPORATION (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHIMEI INNOLUX CORPORATION) AND INNOLUX CORP., Defendants, AND HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD., Movant-Appellant. ______________________ 2013-1178 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in No. 11-CV-0378, Judge J. Rodney Gilstrap. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ MARTIN J. BLACK, Dechert LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for the plaintiff-appellee. With him on the brief were JEFFREY B. PLIES and VINCENT A. GALLO. PETER J. WIED, Goodwin Procter LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for movant-appellant. With him on the brief were TERRY D. GARNETT, VINCENT K. YIP, and JAY C. CHIU. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (LOURIE, PROST, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 13, 2013 Date /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.