INRE: RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY , No. 13-1138 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE: RONALD A. KATZ TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, L.P. ______________________ 2013-1138 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Reexamination No. 90/008,095. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ FRANK V. PIETRANTONIO, Cooley LLP, of Reston, Virginia, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were JONATHAN G. GRAVES, OF RESTON, VIRGINIA, AND LORI R. MASON and LOWELL D. MEAD of Palo Alto, California. THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia argued for appellee. Of counsel on the brief were NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, and STACY B. MARGOLIES, Associate Solicitor. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (WALLACH, LINN, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 7, 2013 Date /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.