IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL CO. v. BIBOW INDUSTRIES, INC. , No. 13-1112 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IRWIN INDUSTRIAL TOOL COMPANY (doing business as Lenox), Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BIBOW INDUSTRIES, INC. AND CHRISTOPHER W. BIBOW, Defendants-Appellants. ______________________ 2013-1112 ______________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in No. 11-CV-30023, Judge Douglas P. Woodlock. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ RACHAEL A. HARRIS, Squire Sanders (US) LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With her on the brief was JOHN A. BURLINGAME. EDWARD P. DUTKIEWICZ, of Dade City, Florida, argued for defendants-appellants. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, PROST, and WALLACH, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 23, 2013 Date /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.