VODA v. MEDTRONIC, INC. , No. 13-1045 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ JAN K. VODA, M.D., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant, v. MEDTRONIC, INC., AND MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC., Defendants-Appellants. ______________________ 2013-1045, -1053 ______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma in No. 09-CV-0095, Senior Judge Leonard Tim. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ MITCHELL G. STOCKWELL, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, argued for plaintiffcross-appellant. With him on the brief were D. CLAY HOLLOWAY, ALYSON L. WOOTEN and RICHARD W. GOLDSTUCKER. Of counsel on the brief was JOHN A. KENNEY, McAffee & Taft, of Oklahoma City, Oklahoma. MARK C. FLEMING, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP, of Boston, Massachusetts, argued for defend- ants-appellants. With him on the brief were LAUREN B. FLETCHER, SARAH B. PETTY, and SHIRLEY X. LI CANTIN. Of counsel on the brief was MICHAEL SIMONS, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, of Austin, Texas. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and REYNA, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT November 18, 2013 Date /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk of Court

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.