WOLFCHILD V. U.S. , No. 12-5035 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. mtniteb ~tate5 (!Court of ~peaI5 for tbe jfeberaI (!Circuit SHELDON PETERS WOLFCHILD, ERNIE PETERS LONGWALKER, SCOTT ADOLPHSON, MORRIS J. PENDLETON, BARBARA FEEZOR BUTTES, WINIFRED ST. PIERRE FEEZOR, AUTUMN WEAVER, ARIES BLUESTONE WEAVER, ELIJAH BLUESTONE WEAVER, RUBY MINKEL, LAVONNE A. SWENSON, WILLIS SWENSON, AARON SWENSON, BEVERLY M. SCOTT, LILLIAN WILSON, MONIQUE WILSON, SANDRA COLUMBUS GESHICK, CHERYL K. LORUSSO, JENNIFER K. LORUSSO, CASSANDRA SHEVCHUK, JASON SHEVCHUK, JAMES PAUL WILSON, EVA GRACE WILSON, BENITA M. JOHNSON, AND KEVIN LORUSSO, Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, AND ANITA D. WHIPPLE ET AL., DESCENDANTS OF LUCY TRUDELL, BONNIE RAE LOWE, ET AL., DESCENDANTS OF JOSEPH GRAHAM, ET AL., LENOR ANN SCHEFFLER BLAESER ET AL., DESCENDANTS OF JOHN MOOSE, AND MARY BETH LAFFERTY, ET AL., Plaintiffs, AND COURSOLLE DESCENDANTS AND ROCQUE AND TAYLOR DESCENDANTS, WOLFCHILD v. us 2 Plaintiffs, AND DEBORAH L. SAUL, LAURA VASSAR, ET AL., LYDIA FERRIS ET AL., DANIEL M TRUDELL, ET AL., ROBERT LEE TAYLOR, ET AL., AND DAWN HENRY, Plaintiffs, AND RAYMOND CERMAK, SR., (ACTING INDIVIDUALLY AND UNDER A POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR STANLEY F. CERMAK, SR.), MICHAEL STEPHENS, ET AL., JESSE CERMAK, ET AL., DENISE HENDERSON, DELORES KLINGBERG, SALLY ELLA ALKIRE, PIERRE ARNOLD, JR., AND GETRUDE GODOY ET AL., Plaintiffs, AND JOHN DOES 1-30, WINONA C. THOMAS ENYARD, AND KITTO, ET AL., Plaintiffs, AND FRANCINE GARREAU, ET AL., Plaintiffs, AND FRANCIS ELAINE FELIX, Plaintiff, AND KE ZEPHIER, ET AL., WOLFCHILD v. 3 Plaintiffs, AND LOWER SIOUX INDIAN COMMUNITY, Plaintiff, AND PHILIP W. MORGAN, Plaintiff, AND REBECCA ELIZABETH FELIX, Plaintiff, AND VERA A. ROONEY, ET AL., Plaintiffs, AND DANNY LEE MOZAK, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, AND DAWN BURLEY, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, AND HARLEY ZEPHIER, SR., Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, AND JOHN DOES 1-433, Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, us WOLFCHILD v. us 4 AND JULIA DUMARCE, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, AND RAYMOND COURNOYER, SR., ET AL., JERRY ROBINETTE, ET AL., SANDRA KIMBELL, ET AL., CHARLENE WANNA, ET AL., AND LESLIE LEE FRENCH, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, AND KRISTINE ABRAHAMSON, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, AND VICTORIA ROBERTSON VADNAIS, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant. 2012-5035, -5036, -5043 Appeals from the United States Court of Federal Claims in consolidated case nos. 03-CV-2684 and 01-CV0568, Judge Charles F. Lettow. ON MOTION 5 WOLFCHILD v. us ORDER Victoria Roberson Vadnais moves to substitute Deryl Edwards as counsel of record for Royce Deryl Edwards, Jr. Julia Dumarce et al., Harley Zephier, Sr., and Vadnais move without opposition for an extension of time to file their response and principal brief. The United States moves to clarify the briefing schedule. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: 1) The motion to substitute counsel is granted. New counsel for Victoria Roberson Vadnais must file an entry of appearance within 14 days of this order. 2) The motion for an extension of time is granted to the extent that the brief received December 3, 2012, is accepted for filing. 3) The motion to clarify the briefing schedule is granted to the extent that the United States' reply brief is due 21 days from the date of this order. FOR THE COURT DEC 14 2012 Date /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk cc: Wood R. Foster, Jr., Esq. Scott Allen Johnson, Esq. Garrett J. Horn, Esq. Jack E. Pierce, Esq. Elizabeth T. Walker, Esq. Nicole Nachtigal Emerson, Esq. u.s. couJ~arJ,EALS FOR THE FEDER'''. C!RCUIT DEC 1 4 lUll JANHORBALY CLERK WOLFCHILD v. us Francis Elaine Felix James Lawrence Blair, Esq. Douglas R. Kettering, Esq. Philip William Morgan Rebecca Elizabeth Felix Bernard Joseph Rooney, Esq. Erick G. Kaardal, Esq. Creighton A. Thurman, Esq. Kelly Stricherz, Esq. Larry B. Leventhal, Esq. Robin L. Zephier, Esq. Gary John Montana, Esq. Randy Vern Thompson, Esq. John L. Smeltzer, Esq. Barry P. Hogan, Esq. Deryl Edwards, Esq. s25 6

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.