LEVITON MANUFACTURING CO v. ITC , No. 12-1483 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ LEVITON MANUFACTURING CO., INC., Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, AND FUJIAN HONGAN ELECTRIC CO., LTD. AND ZHEJIANG TRIMONE ELECTRIC SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., Intervenors. ______________________ 2012-1483 ______________________ Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-739. --------------------FUJIAN HONGAN ELECTRIC CO., LTD. AND ZHEJIANG TRIMONE ELECTRIC SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., Appellants, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, AND LEVITON MANUFACTURING CO., INC., Intervenor. ______________________ 2012-1493 ______________________ Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-739. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ LARRY L. SHATZER, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, of Washington, DC, argued for Leviton Manufacturing Co., Inc. With him on the brief were VERONICA S. ASCARRUNZ and SHAUN R. SNADER; STEFANI E. SHANBERG, of San Francisco, California; MATTHEW A. ARGENTI, of Palo Alto, California; and NATALIE J. MORGAN, of San Diego, California. CLARK S. CHENEY, Attorney, Office of General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, of Washington, DC, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were DOMINIC L. BIANCHI, Acting General Counsel and WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, Assistant General Counsel. LEI MEI, Mei & Mark, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for Fujian Hongan Electric Co., Ltd., et al. With him on the brief was REECE W. NIENSTADT. 3 ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (PROST, MOORE, and O MALLEY, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT August 13, 2013 Date /s/ Daniel E. O Toole Daniel E. O Toole Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.