ASIA PACIFIC MICROSYSTEMS V. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION , No. 12-1225 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. mntteb ~tate~ <!Court of §ppeaI~ for tbe jfeberaI QCtrcutt ASIA PACIFIC MICROSYSTEMS, INC., Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee, AND HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY AND HEWLETTPACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P., Intervenors. 2012-1225 On appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-723. ON MOTION Before SCHALL, Circuit Judge. ORDER ASIA PACIFIC v. ITC 2 Asia Pacific Microsystems, Inc. ("APM") moves for an extension of time to file its corrected brief out of time and for leave to file a notarized affidavit out of time. The International Trade Commission (ITC), Hewlett-Packard Company and Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. (Hewlett-Packard) oppose. APM responds. ITC and Hewlett-Packard move without opposition for an extension of time to file their briefs. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: (1) APM's motion for an extension of time to file a corrected brief is granted to the extent that APM's corrected brief is due 30 days from the date of this order. No further extensions will be granted. (2) APM's motion for leave to file a notarized affidavit is denied. (3) ITC and Hewlett-Packard's motion for extension of time is granted to the extent that their briefs are due 40 days after APM's corrected brief is filed. FOR THE COURT NOV 02 2012 Date cc: Steven D. Ling, Esq. PanyinA. Hughes, Esq. Ahmed J. Davis, Esq. s26 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk iLED u.s. COURfOF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERH r.mCU1T NOV 02 ~OlL JANHORBAlY ClERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.