WYETH AND CORDIS V. ABBOTT LABORATORIES , No. 12-1223 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. Wniteb $)tates QCourt of §ppeaIs for toe jfeberaI QCircuit WYETH AND CORDIS CORPORATION, Plaintiffs / Counterclaim Defendants-Appellants, v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ABBOTT CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INC., ABBOTT LABORATORIES, INC., MEDTRONIC INC., MEDTRONIC VASCULAR, INC., AND MEDTRONIC USA, INC., Defendants / Counterclaimants-Appellees, AND BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION AND BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC., Defendants / Counterclaimants- Appellees. 2012-1223, -1224 Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in case nos. 08-CV-0230 and 08CV-1021, Judge Joel A. Pisano. WYETH v. ABBOTT LABS 2 ON MOTION Before RADER, Chief Judge. ORDER Wyeth and Cordis Corporation ("Appellants") have filed two motions: 1) a motion for leave to file an extended reply brief not to exceed 11,000 words; and 2) a motion for leave to file an extended reply brief not to exceed 9,000 words. Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Scimed Inc. oppose the first motion and consent to the second motion. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motions are granted to the extent that Appellants may file a reply brief not to exceed 9,000 words. FOR THE COURT HOV 14 2m2 Date cc: David T. Pritikin, Esq. Edward A. Mas, II, Esq. Matthew M. Wolf, Esq. Samuel F. Baxter, Esq. s25 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk fiLED . COlIIT.Of APPEALS rOo UJ.~ FEDERAL r,mCIlIT NOV 14 ZUff JANHORBAlV a.en<

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.