IN RE BARTON PATENT 533, LLC., No. 12-1116 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ IN RE BARTON PATENT 533, LLC ____________________ 2012-1116 (Re-examination No. 90/010,064) ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. ______________________ JUDGMENT ______________________ KEITH J. GRADY, Polsinelli Shughart PC, of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for the appellant. With him on the brief were GRAHAM L. W. DAY and ROBYN H. AST. NATHAN K. KELLEY, Deputy Solicitor, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for appellee. On the brief were RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, LYNNE E. PETTIGREW and ROBERT J. MCMANUS, Associate Solicitors. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED: PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and MOORE, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT October 15 2012 Date /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.