BRIGHT RESPONSE V. YAHOO!, No. 12-1045 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. mniteb ~tate~ ~ourt of ~eaI~ for tbe jfeberaI ~irtuit BRIGHT RESPONSE, LLC, FORMERLY KNOWN AS POLARIS IP, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. YAHOO! INC., Defendant-Appellant. 2012-1045 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case no. 07-CV-0371, Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham_ ON MOTION ORDER Yahoo! Inc. moves without opposition to stay the briefing schedule pending entry of a final judgment in the underlying case relating to inequitable conduct issues, so that an appeal from those issues may be consolidated with the above-captioned appeal. Upon consideration thereof, BRIGHT RESPONSE v. YAHOO 2 IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. The parties are directed to move for consolidation within 14 days of any appeal of the district court's final judgment on the inequitable conduct issue and the stay of the briefing schedule will be lifted upon action on that motion. FOR THE COURT DEC 2 1 2011 Date lsI Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk U. eouJ~~~~EALS POIt THE FEDE~AL CIRCUIT cc: Andrew D. Weiss, Esq. Jason C. White, Esq. s24 OF.;C 2 1 20\1 JAN HORBALY CLERK

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.